First, nowhere else in Scripture is a thousand-year millennium clearly taught, and a new doctrine should not be founded on an intensely controversial text, especially from an apocalyptic book full of symbolism.<\/p>\n
Second, we have seen that Revelation is recursive and recapitulatory, coming to the end and then telling the same story again from a fresh perspective. John might be doing the same thing in Revelation 20<\/a>, telling the story of Revelation 19:11\u201321<\/a> from another perspective.<\/p>\n Third, many of the texts allegedly speaking of the millennium in the OT (e.g., Isaiah 60<\/a> and Ezekiel 40\u201348<\/a>) are not alluded to in Revelation 20<\/a>.<\/p>\n What is even more striking is that these same chapters are copiously alluded to in Revelation 21:1\u201322:5<\/a>. In other words, the so-called millennial texts are fulfilled in the new creation! This suggests the promises of a renewed world and new temple in the OT are fulfilled in the new creation, not in a millennium.<\/p>\n Some want to say the fulfillment is in both the millennium and the new creation, but it is hard to see how the new temple prophesied in Ezekiel 40\u201348<\/a> is fulfilled in any way in the millennium.<\/p>\n Fourth, the early church fathers were divided on the millennium. Sometimes it is claimed the earliest fathers were premillennial, but Charles Hill has demonstrated the matter was disputed, and many were amillennialists<\/a>. Hence, we cannot appeal to the early church to find a consensus on the matter.<\/p>\n Fifth, the historic premillennial view has difficulty explaining the unglorified people in the millennium, for when Jesus returns at the end of chapter 19, he destroys all his enemies.<\/p>\n It is straining to say that some were left on earth who survived Jesus\u2019s return.<\/p>\n The NT clearly teaches Jesus\u2019s return is the day of reward and judgment for all (Matt. 25:31\u201346<\/a>).<\/p>\n Sixth, in Scripture the final resurrection, final judgment, victory over death, arrival of the new creation, and second coming of Christ are part of a total package<\/a>.<\/p>\n There is no indication in any other text that these great events are separated.<\/p>\n[3. The Supposed Millennium Texts of the OT Don\u2019t Appear in Revelation 20\u2014But They Do in the New Creation Texts of Revelation 21\u201322]<\/h3>\n
[4. The Early Church Fathers Were Divided on This Question]<\/h3>\n
[5. Who Are the Unglorified People in the Millennium If Jesus Destroys All His Enemies at the End of Revelation 19?]<\/h3>\n
[6. Scripture Nowhere Separates Out the Timing of the Final Resurrection, Final Judgment, Victory over Death, Arrival of the New Creation, and Second Coming of Christ]<\/h3>\n
[7. Amillennialism Fits Best with the Rest of the Scriptures]<\/h3>\n